Kids & Parenting

I Lost My Son

It wasn't fun.

Before she went rogue, Sarah Palin got lost. She was stalking "majestic dall sheep with their thick curled horns," she writes in her new book, in Mount McKinley National Park. "I was only about eight years old, and for a couple of anxious hours of climbing hillsides and calling my name, no one could find me on the crags and snowpack." Her father played it cool, "but inside, he was pretty frantic." She was found, at last, asleep on a rocky slope in a white T-shirt that made her look like one of the sheep.

Even though I presently have Palin frustration seeping out of my pores, this story struck a sympathetic chord. A few months ago, my 6-year-old, Simon, got lost. He was unfindable for 45 minutes, somewhere in woods on the shoreline, within reach of open water, and very much out of my reach and sight.

I did not think, Oh good, he is exploring the world, may he go forth and frolic, the way I would have no doubt counseled some other mother to do—at least hearing the story after the fact. I felt only panic. And when we found him, I was seized by the most powerful surge of mother-bear instinct I've ever experienced and vowed silently to never let him go more than 10 feet away from me in the outdoors again.

This story doesn't fit well with my theory of parenthood, the one in which children have the freedom to wander and encounter adversity, where parents understand that human beings need hardship to learn, and a central problem of middle-class mothering is that we're so terrified of appearing neglectful that we put our children on leashes, both literally and virtually. What I take from the afternoon of Simon's disappearance is a dose of humility. Theory never quite matches up with practice the way we want it to, does it? Especially when it comes to parenting. Also, dogma begs for a corrective. Some mothers don't give their children enough free rein and I don't want to be one of them. But what about giving too much?

Here's what happened: My husband and two kids and I were visiting the house of a friend and colleague on the shore in Connecticut. In a loose group of eight (three parents, two hosts, three kids), we went for a walk through a stand of pine and birch, surely no more than a square mile. Simon and another 6-year-old boy ran ahead down the path and picked a tree to hide behind. They jumped out and yelled "boo" and chortled at their own cleverness. Repeat twice. Then I watched them sprint off out of sight. I was at the front of the pack of adults, and I turned a corner and saw that the path forked ahead of me. I wasn't sure which way the boys had gone. But I figured the left-hand fork couldn't lead them far astray because it looked like a long dirt driveway.

I went to the right. Everyone else followed me. After maybe 10 minutes, I started looking for Simon and his friend instead of waiting for them to pop out from behind another tree. No sign. I started calling. No response. I admitted to the friend I was walking with that I didn't know where the kids were. This sounds like a natural step, but in the moment, I hesitated to take it. I didn't want to break the lovely peace of the afternoon. I didn't want to worry our hosts.

But eventually, it couldn't be helped: We called for the boys, and they didn't answer, so we had to start looking for them. At first we made small dry jokes about how they would be around the bend. They weren't. We split up and scattered, calling the boys' names. I walked down the path to the left, which was indeed a driveway, and found a family innocently sitting down at a picnic table. They looked sinister to me: Could they be hiding two boys?

Tags: abduction, child kidnapping, childhood, kidnapping, missing children

Emily Bazelon is a founding editor of Double X, and a writer and editor at Slate.

Comments

Thoughts About These Hyper-First Person Pieces

By: Joyce | Mon, 11/23/2009 - 19:16

First, I agree that the headline on this article is appalling. I would be willing to overlook it if DoubleX usually used reasonable headlines but DoubleX headlines are routinely stupid or misleading. ("Can Reading 'How French Women Stay Thin' Turn Me Into Catherine Deneuve in Ten Days?") This headline takes that practice to a shockingly manipulative level.

The purpose of these hyper-first person articles puzzles me. Emily seems to be trying to recreate all the thoughts that passed through her mind while her son was lost. But why? Isn't the point of the article that she panicked, not the specific thoughts she had during her panic? Her fear of the picnickers was more ridiculous than she admits. Not only are there very few stranger abductions, but those strangers actively seek out the children they abduct. They don't sit around hoping children will walk up to them, they don't act in groups, and they don't stick around after they have abducted a child. If she's not going to use her fears to identify a better way to handle the situation if it ever arises again, why share the details?

This hyper-first person perspective also precludes her from analyzing the experience of getting lost from a child's perspective. Everyone I know has a story about the time that they got lost as a child. It is an essential part of growing up. It's the thing that makes children understand the purpose behind all those constant instructions about where to go and where not to go and how far to go. Frequently the entire event is so brief that the parents don't realize that their child has passed an emotional milestone. Because this article views the experience solely from the parent's point of view, it becomes an article about how it feels to be a parent rather than an article about the act of parenting.

Reading this

By: _Nancy_ | Sat, 11/21/2009 - 13:39

had my stomach in knots. Part of the problem in letting kids roam a little is that since it's the exception these days rather than the rule, there really is a learning curb involved which we as parents don't necessarily think about until we're in one of these situations. "I told him about not eating toadstools, didn't I?? He knows not to cross the log bridge on his own? Doesn't he?" I have SO been there.

The truth is, it's a learning curb for all of us. Maybe if children were allowed to roam on a more regular basis from an earlier age - like they do in most parts of the world it wouldn't be so hard.

And as for other two angry commentators, I just want to thank you. Thank you for reducing the loss of a child to a matter of semantics. I'll think of you the next time I "misplace" my car keys, my head and most especially my sense of proportion.

I agree with Katie. You

By: buggie | Fri, 11/20/2009 - 11:12

I agree with Katie. You didn't "lose your son." You misplaced him for 45 minutes.

Dear DoubleX

By: Katie27again | Fri, 11/20/2009 - 10:16

Dear DoubleX headline writers, FUCK YOU. Emily Bazelon did not lose her son. But I'm sure there are many mothers out there who have lost their sons/daughters, saw this headline and felt cheaply, outrageously manipulated. I can roll my eyes at cheap link-bait, but this crosses a line. Change it, please.

jon hamm on SNL as scott brown

SNL: Equal Opportunity Objectifiers

Jon Hamm spent most of the Saturday Night Live episode he hosted last night shirtless.

Allison Silverman at the Muse Awards

Confessions of a Woman Comedy Writer

Allison Silverman accepts one from New York Women in Film & Television (and tells us why it's rare).