Arts
Two Dudes and a Gay Porn: A Q&A With the Director of Humpday
Lynn Shelton talks about modern masculinity and doing your best friend.
The premise of Lynn Shelton’s third feature film, Humpday, borders on preposterous. The movie tells the story of two straight male friends, Ben and Andrew, who have agreed to make a gay porn together. Ben is a staid, married Seattleite who works as a transportation planner. Andrew is a bearded weirdo who blows in one night after a sojourn in Chiapas, Mexico. Yet the idea that they would perform in an “arty” sex film is completely believable in the context of the movie.
Shelton is able to make the semi-absurd seem utterly natural because of her filmmaking process. She develops characters with her actors before she starts writing an outline, and the dialogue in her film is largely ad-libbed. Because it is low-budget and collaborative, Humpday has already been lumped in with the Mumblecore movement—a group of indie movies made for, by, and about passionless, quasi-bohemian young mumblers, as The New Yorker’s David Denby puts it. But Humpday doesn’t really fit the mumblecore M.O. The film deals with big questions of identity, sexuality, and fidelity, and emotions run high throughout. Will Ben and Andrew go through with their plan? What does it mean that Ben really wants to have sex with his best dude, even though he’s supposedly happily married? In an interview with Double X, Shelton discusses what inspired her to make a movie that takes bromance to the next level, how she made the leap from actress to editor to director, why she describes her 20s as her “Geisha years,” and more.
I know the movie was quite collaborative. Talk me through the way a scene would be created.
Lynn Shelton: I start with people I want to work with. I started with Mark Duplass (Ben), and invited him to help create his own character. The second one to come into the process was Joshua Leonard (Andrew). We talked a lot about that relationship and its history and its backstory. That way, when I sit down to write a scene, I know who the characters are. I worked with [Mark and Joshua] for a few months and went back to write the outline. And I realized there were these giant holes because I didn’t have a wife yet. She was a question mark. So I had to get that role cast, so that I could figure out who Anna is, and can have her be as fully fleshed-out as the guys.
And what happens once you’re on set?
Shelton: Once we’re on set, there’s no rehearsal. They know exactly who they are, exactly what the history is, exactly what’s happened up to this point. They have to live the scene out. Sometimes we’ll try to figure it out beforehand, but usually we’ll just talk about what we’re aiming for and I’ll let them go. We shoot, on average, a 20-minute take, but sometimes we’ll go for 40 minutes. I let them overwrite, unless they’re going on some tangent that’s not going in the right direction. I’m watching the scene play out as an editor, which is my background. You could have made any number of terrible movies out of the footage. It’s really setting up a false documentary situation, and shooting as a fly on the wall. Documentaries get written in the editing.
It does have an almost documentary feel to it. Going in I was thinking: How is it going to seem realistic that these two straight men have agreed to be in a porno? But it makes complete sense when you’re actually watching the movie.
Shelton: It started as such a fantastical and base thing. The idea of these two dudes, who had known each other for a long time, and now they really have really different lives. And they somehow get it in their heads that they’re going to have sex with each other. The first reaction from both [Mark and Joshua] was, “This is impossible to do. It’s impossible to tell this story in a believable way.” Making it realistic became our number one goal. Every step of the way, everybody on the set was on high alert for false notes. If something didn’t quite feel right, we would reexamine it.

SNL: Equal Opportunity Objectifiers
Jon Hamm spent most of the Saturday Night Live episode he hosted last night shirtless.

Confessions of a Woman Comedy Writer
Allison Silverman accepts one from New York Women in Film & Television (and tells us why it's rare).
Comments
BTW, its not masculinity, its
By: Usama3 | Wed, 07/08/2009 - 11:48
BTW, its not masculinity, its misandry that this "artist" is discussing. Its increasingly widespread in modern pop culture: adult straight males are the buffoons of countless sitcoms, children's and adult cartoons. They are the antagonist/villians in countless movies, TV shows, books. Commercials almost uniformally utilize adult males as the foil and buffoon. This constant barrage of misandry reenforces the psychological problems that are growing in today's young males. For the record, less than 50% of black and latino males graduate from high school.
This movie and the concepts
By: Usama3 | Wed, 07/08/2009 - 11:27
This movie and the concepts surrounding it reenforce the observations that many have made regarding homosexual conduct and Western sexual culture: that homosexual conduct is not genetically or biologically driven, but are matters of human will. And that Western culture and its sexual norms are increasingly misandrous, deconstructing straight male identity and subverting patriarchal based norms.
The director's hostility is palatable. Males in female dominated industries such as nursing and primary and exceptional education, face sexual harassment (if the man is attractive), discrimination, and obsticals too. What motivation moves one to essentially make one's real life antagonists and industry competitors denigrated and humiliated, destroying their lives?
Better than pseudo-indie!
By: LK | Wed, 07/08/2009 - 11:24
Just watched the trailer for this film and I'm really excited to see it! I've been amazingly frustrated lately with these mainstream pretend-indie films with Hollywood budgets and cluttered scripts. (No matter what you thought about "Juno," you have to admit that not a word of the dialogue sounded realistic or natural). Just from the preview, I was stunned that the interactions between characters seem like you're watching the real situation play out in front of you (with conveniently skilled camera angles) as opposed to watching a film or play with "roles" and mumbled acting. I'm impressed! Thanks for the heads-up/more info on the making of this film XX!
Good quick read!
By: manobon | Wed, 07/08/2009 - 11:03
I definitely will try to see this movie (if it becomes available in the area), but- even though I always find sexual identity politics interesting- why is the possibility/acceptance of bisexuality (or pansexuality) seemingly always ignored? Instead of it being a giant looming question which "may forever change the person's outlook on him/herself", why can't it just be, "Oh...well, looks like I'm interested in men And women- huh. How about that?"