Published on Double X (http://www.doublex.com)
What watching ESPN can teach us about mammograms.
By: Darshak Sanghavi
Posted: November 19, 2009 at 9:34 AM
It's not often that a football game can teach us something useful about mammography. But look what happened on Sunday after New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick decided to go for a short fourth-down conversion from his own 28 yard line, with a late six-point lead. The Colts stopped the Pats cold to take possession, and star quarterback Peyton Manning quickly fired off a touchdown pass to win the game for Indianapolis.
Like a woman considering whether to have a mammogram, Belichick—widely considered one of the wiliest and most data-driven coaches in the game—had to process complex probabilities to make a decisive, if controversial, call. What's amazing is how mathematically sophisticated fans and sports commentators are in their analysis of Belichick's decision not to punt. Sports Illustrated labeled Belichick's call "I'm-smarter-than-they-are hubris," but only after it reviewed the preceding plays in numerical detail [2]. On the other side, using a complex mathematic model, two fans gave Belichick a "thumbs up" for a "courageous and correct call": They calculated [3] the Patriots' chances of winning at roughly 77 percent by going for it and 76 percent if they had punted instead. The New York Times football blog [4] and the New Republic [5] also dissected probability equations [6] on the matter.
(Read the rest of this article [7] at Slate [8])
Links:
[1] http://www.doublex.com/users/darshak-sanghavi
[2] http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/11/15/mmqb/index.html
[3] http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/zeus-computer-program-supports-belichicks-fourth-down-bid/
[4] http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/defending-belichicks-fourth-down-decision/
[5] http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-plank/belichik-was-right
[6] http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/11/belichicks-4th-down-decision-vs-colts.html
[7] http://www.slate.com/id/2236028/
[8] http://www.slate.com/
[9] http://www.doublex.com/section/health-science/enough-patenting-breast-cancer-gene
[10] http://www.doublex.com/section/health-science/why-poor-women-are-more-likely-die-breast-cancer