From Washington to New Haven, the Rules They Are A-Changin'
-
- |
-
- |
- |
- 2
The plaintiffs in the hotly contested affirmative action case Ricci v. DeStefano stood out among the crowd outside New Haven City Hall today. They wore dress blues and wide smiles or poker-faces that occasionally cracked into grins. They were, but for one, white, and they were celebrating their win in a 5-4 decision handed down by a sharply divided Supreme Court.
Mingling on the sidewalk before the conference, plaintiff Frank Ricci posed for photos with his family. Ben Vargas, the one Hispanic amongst the 18 plaintiffs, grinned beneath his sunglasses and crisp peaked cap. Attorney Karen Torre, surrounded by her clients and jokingly donning one of their caps, delivered a statement in boldly Obama-esque fashion: “We had the audacity of hope—that some court at some point would enforce the letter and spirit of the civil rights laws, accord to firefighters the recognition and respect that they deserve, and reject attempts to lower professional standards of competence for the sake of identity politics.”
It took some audacity indeed to invoke Obama in support of a lawsuit that called into question the country’s most significant civil rights statutes. At a podium in the City Hall foyer, defendant and Mayor John DeStefano lamented the Court’s stance on equal opportunity when he declared this morning’s decision “a continual erosion of civil rights law by the Supreme Court.”
By choosing to hear the case, the Court placed the question of race-influenced hiring decisions back on the table. In an opinion written by Justice Kennedy, the majority decided that “the City made its employment decision because of race. The City rejected the test results solely because the higher scoring candidates were white.” If the city had rejected the results because the exams were poorly constructed or because there was a less discriminatory alternative—see Justice Ginsburg’s dissent for an argument that they were, and there is—then the court might have ruled differently. But scratching test results solely because city officials did not like the complexion of the top scorers, Kennedy argued, “is antithetical to the notion of a workplace where individuals are guaranteed equal opportunity regardless of race.”
Lieutenant Danny Stratton, who’s currently being considered for captain in the Camden, New Jersey Fire Department (see part one of our previous Ricci series for Camden’s own history of racial tension in its firehouses) and who came to New Haven today to show support for the Ricci plaintiffs, explained that diversity plays a big role in his department’s hiring decisions. “But it doesn’t guarantee you’ve got the top guy for the job,” he said. Like Stratton, Max Schneeman is a Camden lieutenant waiting for a promotion to captain. He’d taken the test, he told me, and is part of his own lawsuit. I assumed he meant a reverse discrimination suit similar to Ricci, but Schneeman quickly clammed up, crossing his arms and turning away, his eyes shielded by reflective sunglasses.
DeStefano acknowleged the divisive nature of the case, noting the views of both firefighters like Stratton and Schneeman, but also of those who were conspicuously not present—the minority firefighters. “I have no doubt that there is a set of firefighters who feel that they’ve played by the rules and who feel justified right now,” the mayor said. “And that there’s another group who feel like the rules are stacked against them and that as soon as they start to get ahead, the rules change.”
I kept thinking about the black firefighters I’ve been talking to over the past few weeks, none of whom I saw at the press conference. After decades and decades of lawsuits founded upon civil rights statutes, they have started to get ahead. Blacks and Hispanics, who make up about 60 percent of New Haven’s population, are now more or less proportionally represented within the rank and file of the city’s fire department. But their efforts to penetrate the upper management ranks have been less fruitful. Currently, only one of the city’s 21 fire captains is African-American. The anti-discrimination laws that once won them spots in New Haven’s firehouses are now the laws that have planted the smiles on Frank Ricci’s and Ben Vargas’ faces. There go the rules, changing again.
Photograph of Frank Ricci by Nicole Allan.

Comments
Nicole Allen & Emily Bazelon overlook a key point
By: Josh017 | Wed, 07/01/2009 - 19:00
What you seem to be overlooking is that neutral tests invariably have disparate impact because groups differ in average ability. For instance, East Asians average above whites and Ashkenazi Jews average about 2/3 of a standard deviation above the mean of other whites!
So equal opportunities will still result in unequal outcomes (just as no asian or white has ever gone under 10 seconds in the 100 metres - it's a result of 50,000 years of divergent evolutionary paths).
As William Saletan recently noted: Genes don't determine everything, and most genes don't vary significantly between populations. But research is constantly finding new gene-trait correlations and group differences. If your faith in equality depends on an ethnically or racially even distribution of all ability-influencing genes, you're in trouble.
http://www.slate.com/id/2217571/pagenum/2
There is a discussion of this problem here:
"The foregoing patterns of employability and trainability help to illustrate the implications of the one-standard-deviation (15-point) difference between American Whites and Blacks on valid, unbiased tests of (phenotypic) intelligence. The Hispanic-White difference is about half that, although it varies by subgroup (Cuban, Puerto Rican, and so forth). Asian Americans score at least as well as Whites on tests of intelligence, although they too differ by specific ethnic group (as do Whites). As shown in Figure 1, a one-standard-deviation difference in IQ represents a substantial average difference in trainability and employability.
There are successive increments in average IQ of roughly one standard deviation between assemblers, bank tellers, store managers, and attorneys, for example. Whereas the White average is about 100, which is typical of workers in jobs of moderate prestige and complexity (clerical, protective service, and crafts workers), the Black IQ bell curve is centered at about 85, a score that is typical of semiskilled workers.
Current minimum military enlistment standards are set above IQ 85, thus excluding at least half of Blacks. Indeed, a 1980 U.S. Department of Defense study showed that whereas 71 to 89% of White men 18 to 23 years old were eligible for enlistment on the basis of aptitude and education (the Air Force being the most stringent and the Army the least), the percentages were only 21 to 41% for Black men and 38 to 53% for Hispanic men (Eitelberg, 1988, p. 99). Figure 1 illustrates why the disparate impact of valid, race-neutral hiring becomes even more acute in higher levels of education and employment. The proportion of Blacks who are available at successively higher levels of IQ drops dramatically relative to that of Whites. The Black-White ratio changes from 5:1 for IQs below 75 to 1:30 for IQs above 125.
Noncognitive traits such as conscientiousness are important for good job performance (Hunter & Schmidt, 1996). Even when such noncognitive traits might substitute for deficits in cognitive capability, however, they would have to be higher on average among Blacks and Hispanics to compensate for these groups' lower average cognitive skills. Research reveals no such compensatory noncognitive advantage for performing cognitively demanding tasks."
Gottfredson, L. S. (2000). Skills gaps, not tests, make racial proportionality impossible. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(1), 129-143.
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/2000skillsgaps.pdf
Racial fairness in testing
By: sg | Wed, 07/01/2009 - 15:13
Much attention has been given to testing fairness.
Just because different groups perform differently doesn't mean that a test is flawed. Millions of people have taken tests and the data is solid. Minorities as a group consistently score about 2/3 to 1 standard deviation below the white mean and Asians score about 1/3 standard deviation higher. It doesn't matter what test it is, the SAT, GRE, Bar Exam, etc.
Here is a link to a statistical analysis. If you took college level math, you can probably follow the discussion.
http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/testing.htm