Victim-Blaming in the Roman Polanski Documentary

Marina Zenovich’s documentary on the 1977 Roman Polanski rape case (Roman Polanski: Wanted & Desired) is about to become an oft-cited source in the contentious debate about Polanski’s 32-years-removed arrest that went down in Switzerland over the weekend. In it, Zenovich makes the fair argument that the judge overseeing the Polanski case was biased from the get-go—he’s depicted as a celebrity-obsessed, press-provoking joke of a judge whose No.1 concern was his own image. This portrait probably has some truth to it; there was eventually a successful motion to remove him from the case and even the victim has said that the ensuing media shitstorm ruined her adolescense. But the rest of the documentary is a gross overwrought defense of Polanski. I watched it last night (Netflix Instant!) and I felt like I was watching a clique of popular kids defend the star football player. Not because he's innocent (Polanski pleaded guilty to unlawful sex with a minor) but because it would be such a gosh darn tragedy for the team to lose such a great player.

Excepting the lawyers who worked on the case, the majority of the voices in the film are Polanski’s Hollywood friends, and they make great strides to point out the “reputation” of the victim. More than two people note that the girl was not a virgin. In a clip that made me want to stab out my eyeballs, one female friend of Polanski’s goes so far as to mention that the girl’s mother introduced herself to Polanski as “an actress” and then asks, “Why would her mother let her daughter go to a photo shoot alone with him in the first place?” Oh yes, I see, clearly her mother deliberately set her up to be raped in order to advance her career! Now there's some stellar logic fit for inclusion in a documentary. (Note: the film won a Sundance award for editing.) When the interviewees are not busy bashing the girl and her mother, they spend time expounding on Polanski's enormous talent, and what a terrible tragedy it is that something like this would happen to such an important, valuable figure (notice the passive verbs). The documentary oozes with sympathy when covering the myriad of hardships Polanski's endured, including the murder of his pregnant wife at the hands of crazed Manson followers. Yes, his life was truly, truly heartbreaking. But is it possible for a man to be a brilliant director, survive the Holocaust, tragically lose the love of his life to a brutal murder, and still not rape a 13-year-old? Of course.

Tags: HBO, marina zenovich, roman polanski, victim-blaming

Lauren Bans is a Brooklyn-based writer and Internet addict.

Comments

polanski's supporters

By: teaspoon | Wed, 09/30/2009 - 07:48

In the news, several people in support of Polanski seem to be making the argument that statutory rape is really "gray rape". Whoopi Goldberg on The View said, "There's rape, and then there's _rape_ rape."

What the hell does that even mean?

Then his former sister-in-law, on this morning's Today Show, said that "our system is broken". Really? Because we criminalize sex between powerful adults and innocent children?

Also stating a victim's sexual history is NEVER an excuse for rape. She wasn't a virgin, so she's fair game and owes her body to the entire male population? I don't think so. Frankly I'm sickened by this whole ordeal.

oddly enough

By: Sara Dickerman | Mon, 09/28/2009 - 15:13

What I remember from that documentary (which I watched a couple of years ago), so I don't have any examples is just how smug, shifty and guilty Polanski came off. I don't know if that was intentional or not, but the film didn't manage to lionize him...it weaselized him.

Yes, driving me crazy

By: P Starling | Mon, 09/28/2009 - 14:21

The people falling all over themselves with sympathy for Polanski are really appalling me. Yeah, great director, obnoxious judge, sad personal background, etc, etc. But the fact remains that the victim was given Qualuudes and champagne, was kept at Polanski's house when she asked him to take her home, and repeatedly refused sex but was nevertheless raped. That she was thirteen makes this a more sickening crime, but this victim-blaming is nuts, because it wouldn't matter if she was forty and had a battalion of previous lovers. Drugging someone, then making her have sex despite her refusals, is rape. End of discussion.

Frankly, pleading guilty to unlawful sex with a minor sounds like an deal made for a lesser charge. Because this wasn't having consensual sex with a seventeen-year-old. This was rape of a child. That the child had previously been raped and that she couldn't necessarily rely on her parents to protect her are both tragedies. But they don't excuse the next rapist.

So why the hell is the rest of the world behaving like we just slapped Grandma?