Quantico, Guantanamo

I just caught up with the essay in the New York Times Magazine by writer Anne Bernays about her dismay at her grandson, David, becoming a Marine. His decision was an incomprehensible turn of events for Bernays. After all, she writes, she is a liberal Jew who raised her family in Cambridge, Mass. Her children went to the "best schools." They had "no money worries." In other words, people like this simply do not produce Marines. At David's graduation, she has a conflicted sense of pride in his accomplishments. But nowhere does she question her assumption that serving one's country is for other people, those without the education, the money, the privileges of her blessed family. You learn quite a bit in this short piece about Bernays' perfectly predictable reactions—she says she kept silently referring to Quantico, where Marine Basic School is located, as Guantanamo. But you learn almost nothing about the really interesting subject: why her grandson felt this call of patriotism and upended all expectations of him. And she never even considers that it is a bad thing about our country that so few of our elites hear such a call; that many look on it with bafflement, some even with contempt. As Bernays writes about herself: "She couldn't conceive of anyone wanting to do this."

My nephew is a Lieutenant in the Navy who graduated from Annapolis. He, too, grew up in Cambridge, is Jewish, and could have chosen a much easier path. Of course his parents, and the rest of us, have the kind of worries that go along with have a loved one in the military. But I can tell Bernays that our family has looked on Zac's choice with unmitigated pride, with awe at his sense of duty, and with a humility about what he and his comrades do for the rest of us.

Photograph of U.S. Marines in Afghanistan by Joe Raedle/Getty Images.

Tags: elite, elitism, Marines, patriotism

Emily Yoffe is Slate's Dear Prudence and Human Guinea Pig (emilyyoffe@hotmail.com)

Comments

But . . . isn't that what the piece is about?

By: P Starling | Tue, 07/07/2009 - 13:22

It seemed to me that Bernays deliberately distanced herself from her own narration, describing her snooty upper-class puzzlement at her grandson's choice in a way designed to mock her own preconceptions. The somewhat precious narration at the beginning of the piece emphasizes that her ideas about the military were created back in the Vietnam protests. The piece isn't about his choice, but about her being confronted with her attitudes about the military. Warfighters? M-16s? It's outside all her experience. Yet she (guiltily) likes the gun. She finds the kids smart and well-behaved. She comes to realize the significance of her grandson's choice: not that he gets to wear camo and use a lot of acronyms, but that he and his fellow Marines have taken on a duty greater than she, in her idyllic Cambridge life, has ever faced. She was too busy even to protest; her grandson has stepped up and put his entire life on the line.

So no, the tone is light and somewhat mocking, but I don't think it's the Marines who come out badly in this essay.

The disconnect

By: misslkodell | Tue, 07/07/2009 - 12:25

perhaps thats why there are so few congresspeople with children in the military