Hillary vs. Tina: The Brawl Continues

Earlier this week, Tina Brown referred to Hillary Clinton as Obama's submissive "foreign policy wife" in a Daily Beast column. In that same space, she urged Hills to "take off her burqa." Though Brown scored some points in her critique of Clinton's invisibility (where was she this week in Russia?), those critiques were somewhat buried in deliberately provocative and arguably racist asides about how Hillary is Obama's "Saudi" spouse. The whole thing was insulting toward the women of Islam, and I'm not sure why Brown felt it necessary to make those repeated analogies.

Anyway, the column clearly hit a nerve with Hillary, because today, Clinton had her aides respond to Tina's jabs in the New York Times.The Times article says that Hillary has been absent of late because she's nursing a severely broken elbow, and Clinton "professes to be amused, if baffled," by Brown's recent takedown. So what do you think, ladies? Was Tina Brown just giving Hillary much-needed straight talk, or was she just deliberately provoking the Secretary of State for pageviews?

Tags: foreign policy, Hillary Clinton, Islam, secretary of state, spouses, Tina Brown

Jessica Grose is the managing editor of Double X and the co-author of Love, Mom: Poignant, Goofy, Brilliant Messages from Home. Click here to follow her on Twitter.

Comments

Rice, Albright

By: xxreader | Thu, 07/16/2009 - 14:59

How often did they accompany Bush/Clinton on overseas trips? Sect of State and Pres usually travel independently. Wouldn't Hillary be more of a "foreign policy wife" if she sat at Obama's side while he did the talking with Putin?

Sounds like Brown is just trying to stir up some feminist controversy.