Can "Traceable Retail" Revolutionize How We Shop?
-
- |
-
- |
- |
- 3
Rarely is the public let in on how clothes actually get made—the gritty world of sourcing, manufacturing, cross-ocean container shipping, distribution and slick marketing that goes into supplying that perpetually regenerating stock of textile novelties we call fashion.
That may change. On June 7, the New York Times ran a story about the new barcode sticker called GS1 DataBars. DataBars store information that is useful to retailers, the kind of tidings that are meaningless to shoppers: inventory stats and sales data. I marveled at the possibilities of an enhanced version. What if we could scan any object in the marketplace for “behind the label” information—how would that change the way we shopped? Could we influence what got made, and how? Could DataBars be used as a tool for consumer empowerment deployed in thwarting Madison Avenue fictions and promoting cleaner manufacturing?
This concept is already being applied, albeit in a hokey manner, by a few companies that claim to be socially and environmentally responsible. Jewelry by Love Earth, sold at Wal-Mart and Sam's Club, can be scanned for a “chain of custody,” which traces an ornament from the Windexed-shined, velvet-lined display case all the way back to the diamond and gold mines of origin. Icebreaker, a fashion company specializing in woolens, labels each sweater with a “Baacode.” You can enter the code on the Icebreaker website and trace the garment along the supply chain to—you guessed it—the sheep.
One of the reasons why women want to buy fashion from local purveyors is that they can “see” who made their clothes and “trace” how items were produced. This plays into social pressures (and status) associated with “ethical consumption” while feeding the desire to reacquaint our cubicle-drone selves with lost crafts and useful domestic arts, the feminine version of Shop Class as Soulcraft (Home Ec as Soulcraft?). But, if a barcode could let us “see” the steps of industrial production it might usher in a retail revolution, one whose impact goes far beyond the confines of the merely local, nostalgic and handmade: Think factoryspun rather than homespun.
Photograph of factory girls courtsey of the New York Public Library.

Comments
It's a good idea...
By: Webkist | Tue, 06/23/2009 - 16:23
...because then I can be sure I'm buying clothes made in the poorest communities on the planet, since that's where my money will do the most good. Makes far more sense than sending it to (relatively) rich American factory workers.
I think all women will at
By: BeachBum | Tue, 06/23/2009 - 15:01
I think all women will at least think about what they're buying if we had this information. I think women band together pretty naturally. I had to write strongly worded letters to Talbots and other catalogues to tell them I wanted to know where the item was made. It also says alot to me about quality. I'm sick of ordering the exact same item 2 weeks later and having it come back completely different because no quality check was made. My mom tried to boycott goods made in China because of the working conditions but shortly thereafter there was no choice left. Perhaps if retailers looked more closely at what women buy and try to figure out why we'd have fewer problems and better service. Even if it may cost a bit more.
Maybe....
By: irobert | Tue, 06/23/2009 - 13:25
I am guessing Wal Mart and Target shoppers, who buy based on price, like so many other things, will not care. On the other hand, it may make elite "enviromentally responsible" chains be more, you know, responsible. So if we is upper middle class east coasters yes it might change how you shop. A lower middle class mid-westerner probably will shop the same way they always have.